[UPDATE] What are the chances 25 teams pass on Brad Lukowich and Ryan Jones?
by Quisp on Mar 3, 2010 9:40 AM PST
in Trade Deadline
Email
PrintI would say slim, and none. Lukowich, with his two Stanley Cup rings, would be a decent depth defenseman pick-up. Ryan Jones, on the other hand, is just one of those Lombardi-type players (leader, former captain, gritty, blue-paint...). I would be surprised if Jones even gets past Edmonton. Of course, they are stupid, so anything's possible.
[UPDATE: but not that stupid. Oilers claimed Ryan Jones this morning.]
Brandon Worley (PHTonNBC) on Twitter
Brad Lukowich also placed on waivers. Another useful defenseman for anyone in need of blue line depth.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lukowich is terrible.
If everybody DOESN’T pass on him they are stupid. 50% of AHL defencemen right now could do what he does better than he does it. He’s the epitome of “Below Replacement Level”.
Well, to be fair,
I live in Vancouver and had the misfortune of watching him play on more than one occasion. He’s not good.
I guess the lesson here is:
you don’t have to be good to win a Stanley Cup.
by 88fingerslukee on Mar 2, 2010 1:05 PM PST up reply actions
Lukowich cleared waivers
Sent to the Moose.
by 88fingerslukee on Mar 3, 2010 12:02 PM PST up reply actions
So you’re saying that he’s better than Peter Harrold?? That’s a good start…
2009-10 Kings Hockey: Delivering Milk Steaks from the Meat Train at an arena near you!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Mar 2, 2010 1:05 PM PST up reply actions
That's good,
but Harrold is still better…as much as it pains me. What I’m truly saying is, bring one of the guys up from Manchester. Hickey would be nice.
by 88fingerslukee on Mar 2, 2010 1:06 PM PST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
