A Kings Fan's Guide to Panic
The biggest late-season choke in Kings history was this time four years ago, in Andy Murray's last season. This was also, as many of the more paranoid of us are already aware, the last season the NHL took a break for the Olympics. Actually, four years ago today was the high-point of 2005-06, after which, the wheels fell off. It was such a spectacular crap-out that by the end of it I had passed all the way through despair and resignation to hysterical giggling.
If you are familiar with my habit of poring over the schedule for silver linings, you might be able to imagine my pathetic attempts to dredge up the tiniest scrap of hope. "Okay, if Edmonton loses, and the Kings win in regulation, then all they have to do is -- what? F***!" [Kings lose again.] "Okay, well, maybe if --" Etc. I'm just glad there is no blog archive of it.
On March 7, 2006, the Kings were 35-23-5, which was good for 6th place in the West, 2 points from 4th. They then embarked on a 5-12-0 run, during which the coach and staff were fired, Avery mutinied, and Taylor started packing his bags. By the end of it, the Kings were 40-35-5, good for 10th place, 8 points out of the playoffs with 2 games to go. (They finished the season with a two game winning streak.)
So, here we are four years later. Different coach, different GM, different scouts, different mascot, and exactly two -- count 'em, TWO -- of the same players. Totally different teams in every way, except for the jersey, and the accumulated PTSD of 42 seasons of Kings futility.
Just for the sake of argument, what if the last two games of this past week are the start of a 5-12-0 run? Where will the Kings sit at the end of such a nightmare?
They would be 43-32-4, 90 points, with three games left.
At that point, we would have a much clearer picture of the magical playoff point threshold. Right now, I'm betting 95. It could be anywhere from 93-97, depending on who gets hot. So the Kings would probably still be hanging by a thread, with some hope that if they win their last three games, they can squeak in. But those three games would be against PHX, EDM and COL, three highly motivated teams. Even Edmonton I would be scared of in that situation.
And not to make hypothetical matters even more grim, the four games right before the last three are NSH, VAN, ANA, ANA. I guess what I'm saying is, if the Kings are in trouble and spiraling with seven games to go, I think they're screwed. The last seven games will finish the job.
So I'm going to stop worrying about getting to 95 points by the end of game 82. Now my target is 89 points by the end of game 75. Because I think if the Kings are in a position to get to 95 by winning 3 of their last 7 games, they will do it. But if they have to win 6 of 7, it's over.
The Kings have 80 points. By this new yard-stick, they need to get at least 9 points out of their next 11 games, in order to have a shot at the playoffs, 11 points out of 11 games in order to be comfortable, and 13 out of 11 games in order to be in great shape.
Now, even if they manage fewer than 9 points in their next 11 games, they will still mathematically have a shot. My point is, if they aren't at 89 points with seven games left, given who their opponents will be, and given what their psychological state will be (to have fallen so far after having played so well), I don't think they'll have the resiliance to pull it off.
And looking over what I just wrote, I think 11 points may actually be the tipping point. If they go 4-6-1 the next 11, are they going to be confident? I doubt it. 5-5-1. That's what they have to do. 5-5-1 in the next 11 games, then they will have 91 points with seven games to go.
Those eleven games are: CBJ, CHI, DAL, NSH, CHI, NYI, COL, COL, STL, DAL and MIN.
Buckle-up.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
Shhhhhhhhhh!!!!
Ahhh! Quisp! Your love of empirical-based-prognostication just ran head-long into my paranoia based superstition…how dare you verbalize my darkest fear!!!
Retract immediately, I demand it.
by JZarris on Mar 7, 2010 6:17 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Just go ahead and kill me.
That was so f**king depressing. If anyone suicidal reads this, they’ll slice their wrists on the spot.
The one reason I know that nightmare (worse than the scariest horror flick I’ve ever seen) won’t happen is because of the thing you said about “only 2 players left.” This team is different and has shown it pretty much all season. They, unlike us, don’t panic. That’s partly what I love about them so much.
The other thing is Quick. That tough SOB will will us into the playoffs if he has to. He’ll pick up Brown and his “C” by his jersey strap, put him on his back, and shutout those pricks from Nashville and Vancouver in games 76 and77 if need be.
So let’s not get our collective loser-king-panties in a twist over this 2 game slide. The Kings have changed. We fans have changed. It’s our time now. (Well, at least I really, really hope it is and we don’t completely blow it again! Ahhhhhhhh!!!)
Oh yeah, and F**k Jeremy Roenick and his piece of sh*t game during that 05-06 season.
I agree that it's useful to dwell on what's different now
And I would point out two things:
1) Now Mark Hardy doesn’t have to worry about Sean F-ing Avery trying to deck him.
2) It seems to be generally understood now that the players had tuned out Andy Murray and he was no longer an effective coach in that sense. After a while, those quirky little motivational tricks get old, and AM had had an unusually long run with the Kings.
I don’t get the same feeling from TM and the Kings right now. For one thing, I think TM still has a grace period with the players as the anti-Crawford that will last through at least this season. For another, I think TM has structured this team kind of like a family, with him as the patient, but firm Dad and veterans like Smyth and OD and Scuderi (and now Modin and Halpern) as the older brothers who will keep the kids’ pointed in the right direction. And I think that’s a good model for this particular team.
Right now, I’m inclined to see the last two games as the Kings getting a little soft with prosperity rather the beginning of an implosion. They were riding high. They beat Dallas pretty handily, maybe got a little full of themselves. Nashville and Montreal were both lower-tier playoff teams determined to tread water, and they played like they needed the wins more than the Kings did.
We saw something similar happen earlier this season, when the Kings got to within a hand’s breadth of San Jose, and then lost a few games. Then they slapped some sense back into themselves and they got it back together. I think the same thing will happen by the end of the week.
BUDDY
BRO, Luongo is the King. Dont talk to me anymore. Period. Done. Not listening.. sorry what did you say? Exaclty. LUONGO = KING. Done.
by MONEETPAL-SIDHU on Mar 7, 2010 11:12 PM PST reply actions
I am sticking with my 103 points prediction
I only run through the hypothetical nightmare scenario to assure myself that it’s not likely. And it’s not. Even a major crap out of 7-10-1 will get us in.
I just want to make sure we salt away the points we need sooner rather than later. Then, if we go on a losing streak, all that does is drop us down to 7 or 8, and I frankly would love to play San Jose or Chicago, so I’m fine with that.
Wait till this year.
I think the 11 straight losses to finish 2003-2004 was the bigger almost-playoff collapse… but good analysis nonetheless!
true, especially in its totality
going 0-9-2 to finish the season. but the thing is, the Kings were in 8th at the start of that run, and finished up 10 points out of a playoff spot. in ’06, they were within a hair of 4th, and dropped all the way to whatever it was, 8 points out.
I just noticed something about ’04 though: by the time the Kings had dropped seven of those games, they were eight points out with four games to go, so the season was over after the 78th game. This is exactly the scenario I was thinking about in this post, wanting to avoid a scenario in which the Kings had to win 6 of their last 7.
Wait till this year.

by 









