ESPN's Arash Markazi is More Certain Than I Would Be

What is it with sports writers and bold declarations? Having just gone through it with the Vancouver Sun obituary, I find this ESPN post-mortem (link in the box), and I keep thinking, don't these people know that there is a high degree of randomness built into hockey? Don't they know that one game may or may not turn out to be a turning point, or a death knell (etc.) when we look back on it -- after the series is over -- but when the series is still going, it's just guesswork signifying nothing? The Canucks were on their "last leg" two games ago, now the Kings are "doomed." I guess they have to write something.

I personally don't know how the series will play out, and I don't know what it will mean when it plays out however it does. But to make concrete declarations about what is so certain to happen next that it basically already has happened...I don't know...you might turn out to be right, but, flip a coin, you might not. If you're right, does that mean you were right to be so certain about being right? Or is it what we call a Gettier Problem, where -- like my mother-in-law, you're right by accident?

I'm too tired to dig into the ESPN essay in much detail. So I'm just going to cut/paste some of the key assertions.

2010 NHL Playoffs: Arash Markazi: Los Angeles Kings show they're still not there yet - ESPN Los Angeles


While the Kings may remember O'Brien's act and certainly plan to retaliate Sunday in Los Angeles, it won't matter when it comes to deciding the series. The fate of the series was probably decided when Canucks coach Alain Vigneault decided to pair red-hot Mikael Samuelsson, who now has seven goals in the series, on the top line with fellow Swedes Henrik and Daniel Sedin during Game 4. [...] When the Kings' run in this season's Stanley Cup playoffs inevitably comes to an end either Sunday in Los Angeles or Tuesday in Vancouver, they will have been done in by their dependency on a litany of unsustainable "ifs" only a youthful bunch with little to no playoff experience could have thought was realistic. [...] On the surface each one of those ["ifs"] may [come] true and at one point or another in this series may have resulted in a Kings win, but to expect all of them to continue [...] It's not happening. You might get lucky once or twice but championship hockey teams don't depend on as many "ifs" to win playoff games as the Kings have this postseason.[...]  It's not impossible, but if you're banking your postseason success on those odds you're probably also the type to plan your next vacation on winning the lottery. The Kings are [...] far from the finished product general manager Dean Lombardi has been piecing together. When they get there the only "if" that will remain is the "if" all true contenders have: If we play our game, we'll win and it won't matter what the opponent does. [...] The only hope they have to win games in this series is to prevent the Canucks from playing the style of hockey that made them the second highest scoring team in the league and propelled Henrik Sedin to the Art Ross Trophy as the league's top scorer. [...] What the Canucks essentially did to the Kings during their 7-2 shellacking was play the role of overzealous bouncer teaching the upstart youngster a lesson by taking him behind the woodshed and giving him a beating he won't soon forget. The message was simple: You may have had your fun, but it's all over now; come back when you're a little older kid. [...] The Kings may be ready to compete for their playoff lives but they're certainly not ready to compete for the Stanley Cup yet. [...] Friday's embarrassing effort was an indication of how much the Kings' kids, who let a "clown" get in their heads, have to grow.

Just to return to planet Earth for a moment, let's look at some facts.

  1. Vancouver finished two points ahead of the Kings this year. Two points.
  2. The last time Vancouver got out of the second round was 16 years ago, one year after the Kings made it to the finals.
  3. The Sedins have been contained more than half the time in this series alone. Yes, they are excellent hockey players, game-changers. And, yes, they have played well the last four periods. I'm sure they were that good or better in the Chicago series last year, when they choked.
  4. Luongo sucked early, when Quick was brilliant. Lately, Luongo has been solid and Quick has been bad. Which goalie shows up tomorrow?
  5. Before this year, Luongo's playoff record, over nine NHL seasons? 11-11. Twenty-two games. Now he's 14-13. Quick is 2-3. Yeah, that's a big difference. 
  6. Of the five games so far, two of them were not close (one win for each), two went to OT (flip a coin), and one was a hybrid (Kings dominated through two periods, then Canucks uber-dominated). Slight edge to the Canucks. Someone always has a slight edge after game five. If you really dominate your opponent, school them, take them to the woodshed, you don't get to game six.

I just hope the Canucks are reading all these articles in which the series has already been decided.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Jewels From The Crown

You must be a member of Jewels From The Crown to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Jewels From The Crown. You should read them.

Join Jewels From The Crown

You must be a member of Jewels From The Crown to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Jewels From The Crown. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9355_tracker