Uh, no -- Garrett Roe is property of the Los Angeles Kings
by Quisp on Sep 6, 2011 5:06 PM PDT
Email
PrintAlthough given recent events, I suppose it's easy to get confused. But this is NHL.com, owned by the NHL. They should know better. Garrett Roe, not a Flyer.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Maybe they thought we were just an affiliate of the Flyers?
by BobKnob on Sep 6, 2011 8:39 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
This.
"After months of reading other people’s catchy sigs (like yours), I decided I needed one, too." -- DougX
by VoluminousTuna on Sep 6, 2011 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Gotta catch ’em all gotta catch ’em all
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
by Niesy on Sep 6, 2011 11:42 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Yea, it's a weird bug with NHL.com
for example if you google “Trent Hunter Ducks” you can get the same page for Trent Hunter as a member of the Ducks, but he’s not been signed or invited to camp. There’s a few players this works for.
"Maybe (Frans) should concentrate more on FO rather than the thugging aspect of his game." - AP77
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
http://ducks.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8467466
"Maybe (Frans) should concentrate more on FO rather than the thugging aspect of his game." - AP77
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
I may kill somebody
If Garrett Roe ended up somewhere else…
The more you drink, the less gruesome I look.
Writing and inciting at Barca Blaugranes
Troll @shadowking011
Lokomotiv
What a horrible tragedy. Thoughts and sympathies to all family and friends of the players on the plane. Not sure if Pavol Demitra was on board. Ruslan Salei was also on the team.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
